
through
Individual Peace
"Respecting the needs and ambitions of others is the
peak
of human culture."
This blogspot discontinued as of December, 2007; please go to the link below right
"Respecting the needs and ambitions of others is the
peak
of human culture."
Amongst humankind there are different motivations that drive one onto a spiritual path. In
The distinctive motivation leading to the gnana approach is an inner drive to enlarge the self to the ultimate extent possible rather than efface it. This attitude reflects in Vethathirian philosophy as the attainment of understanding is the focus: it all tends toward living the best possible life in consequence of enlightenment. In Swamiji’s autobiography he repeatedly stated that there were basically 3 questions that “haunted” him throughout his youth and into adulthood: what is God, what is life, and why is there poverty? These questions are the only questions: the transcendent reality, the immanent reality and the entire social question: what is the right way to live? These questions were his guiding star: they preoccupied him for years and when he was satisfied that he had thoroughly resolved them, he rested; there was his fulfillment of life, his enlightenment and completion. He was transformed into a joyful ‘gnani’. I have lived with him for years and assure you that in his enlightened lifetime he was the happiest person imaginable: intellectually dynamic, naturally and effortlessly virtuous, and lived truly ‘at play in the fields of the lord’!
To wrap this up, just the other day I found myself reflecting that my fascination with Swamiji AND his teachings was motivated by my own search for satisfactory answers in life -- akin to his own motivation, and I think this is likely true of all his students. His type of personality and the nature of his own quest set the tone for the practices he prescribed and supplied a dialectic approach. Hence, as this weblog indicates, his exposition has led to a scientific theory as well as a philosophical system. Thank you for sharing this; any comments?
Bhakti and gnana – devotion and wisdom -- are traditional ‘paths': both have characteristic tools, but these tools carry the risk of becoming obstacles to transcendence and transformation.
Self and God realization is the ultimate self- transformation toward which every method is a means, not an end in itself. Liberation from suffering may be approached by certain means and methods, but entails far more inner work than can be told or taught either in words or forms; also utmost sincerity, inborn talent, perseverance and the indispensible, mysterious benediction of divine Grace.
The ‘spiritual’ life is nothing but an extension of the ordinary life. We step to the edge of the ordinary life and stand there, looking in and looking out in wonder, and that is the fascination.
We humans have made life charming for ourselves – we have made our pleasures and our pains all to order and dwell in their midst. We cry over our pain, our suffering, but feel it’s worth living when we have our pleasures at hand; sometimes it seems our pains are only to throw our pleasure into relief and so define pleasure, make it enjoyable. Is lack of pain, or relief from pain, the only pleasure? Or is pleasure, happiness, the basic state, only perturbed by temporary pain of one sort or another? Peel away at the layers...it’s one more kind of pleasure!
*********
Two articles: Center and Circumference part I and II, have been posted in the Spiritual Teachings section in the site:
Everything is an active interplay; nothing is really passive.
Swamiji often used fruit on the tree to illustrate the concepts of love and compassion: love is holding the fruit, compassion is the feeding, the perfect nourishing of it. So love appears to be passive, compassion is active. Right? But even the love, the holding, must exert a resistance to being separated. It's an action of Will in the form of resistance.
The existence and functions of Will are a great mystery! any thoughts on it to share??
As we know and perceive only causative, linear relations in space and time, and even our abstract concepts are perforce relevant to that, we consequently describe our God as the ultimate concept in space and time: i.e. plenum, force, consciousness and time – to say God is infinite, eternal and non-contingent expresses the ultimate as transcending space-time, using these terms as we have no other concepts we can comprehend. We maintain that this infinite, eternal and non-contingent Being gives rise to our world of causation in space/time and thereby establish a spiritual as well as scientific base for our perceived universe. It would be possible to describe a purely abstract, un-perceived universe such as in string theory, but this too is defined in terms related to our oldest and only friend: space-time!